2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2007.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic stability of a non-conservative viscoelastic rectangular plate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two boundary conditions are investigated, namely, simple supports and a combination of simple and fixed supports. The solution is verified against the previous results obtained for SSSS and CSCS viscoelastic plates subject to uniformly distributed tangential loads by Wang et al (2007).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Two boundary conditions are investigated, namely, simple supports and a combination of simple and fixed supports. The solution is verified against the previous results obtained for SSSS and CSCS viscoelastic plates subject to uniformly distributed tangential loads by Wang et al (2007).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The results for the viscoelastic plate subject to a triangularly distributed tangential force are given in comparison to the results for a viscoelastic plate subject to a uniformly distributed tangential force which was studied in Wang et al (2007) and Zhou and Wang (2014). The results for the SSSS and CSCS boundary conditions are given in Table 1 for H = 10 −5 (nondimensional viscoelasticity coefficient).…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Equation 30is reduced to the complex eigenvalue equation of the elastic plate. In order to verify the DQM program, the first three-order natural frequencies of the transverse free vibration of elastic plate with four-edge simply supported boundary conditions are calculated firstly, and the results are in good agreement with those exhibited in [31], which can be seen from Table 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 61%