2016
DOI: 10.1109/tse.2015.2512266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Software Project Scheduling through a Proactive-Rescheduling Method

Abstract: Link to publication on Research at Birmingham portal General rightsUnless a licence is specified above, all rights (including copyright and moral rights) in this document are retained by the authors and/or the copyright holders. The express permission of the copyright holder must be obtained for any use of this material other than for purposes permitted by law.• Users may freely distribute the URL that is used to identify this publication.• Users may download and/or print one copy of the publication from the U… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
85
0
8

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
85
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The experiments performed on a set of 48 benchmark instances showed that the proposed algorithm can solve the SPSP effectively and outperform a strategy based on a simple random selection of the operators as well as a state-of-the-art approach from the literature. Future work includes a detailed analysis of the behavior of the proposed algorithm and the reasons for its ability to generate better solutions; an extension of the proposed algorithm in order to deal with the dynamic SPSP [13]; the use of alternative AOS strategies; and the inclusion of more aspects that could affect software projects into the problem formulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experiments performed on a set of 48 benchmark instances showed that the proposed algorithm can solve the SPSP effectively and outperform a strategy based on a simple random selection of the operators as well as a state-of-the-art approach from the literature. Future work includes a detailed analysis of the behavior of the proposed algorithm and the reasons for its ability to generate better solutions; an extension of the proposed algorithm in order to deal with the dynamic SPSP [13]; the use of alternative AOS strategies; and the inclusion of more aspects that could affect software projects into the problem formulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As can be seen in the results section, the algorithm always converges to the best solution while the number of evaluations to the fitness function decreases monotonically. To calculate the population's entropy we used the Shannon entropy equation as shown in Equation 1.…”
Section: Merging Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In project scheduling, we usually want to minimize the makespan and total salary cost simultaneously. However, given a tighter deadline must be met, the salary cost may not be important and would not be considered as an objective any longer under the new circumstance [23][24][25]. In some other examples, if an application is running on a system with a wired power supply, there is no need to consider the energy consumption [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%