2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.06.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic simulation of pure hydrogen production via ethanol steam reforming in a catalytic membrane reactor

Abstract: Ethanol steam reforming (ESR) was performed over Pd-Rh/CeO2 catalyst in a catalytic membrane reactor (CMR) as a reformer unit for production of fuel cell grade pure hydrogen. Experiments were performed at 923 K, 6–10 bar, and fuel flow rates of 50–200 µl/min using a mixture of ethanol and distilled water with steam to carbon ratio of 3. A static model for the catalytic zone was derived from the Arrhenius law to calculate the total molar production rates of ESR products, i.e. CO, CO2, CH4, H2, and H2O in the ca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering other aspects related to the mechanical stability of the membrane, a total pressure of 10 bar for the retentate side was selected as the most appropriate operating condition to be used in the membrane reactor, both for ethanol and methane intakes. The stability of H 2 -selective membranes at this operating pressure was demonstrated in previous works at lab scale, avoiding cracks generation or delamination of the selective film [36,40].…”
Section: Reactor Design Optimizationsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Considering other aspects related to the mechanical stability of the membrane, a total pressure of 10 bar for the retentate side was selected as the most appropriate operating condition to be used in the membrane reactor, both for ethanol and methane intakes. The stability of H 2 -selective membranes at this operating pressure was demonstrated in previous works at lab scale, avoiding cracks generation or delamination of the selective film [36,40].…”
Section: Reactor Design Optimizationsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Under this perspective, and considering that temperatures above 650 • C do not increase the hydrogen productivity remarkably, this value was selected as the most appropriate operating temperature to perform the process when feeding both ethanol and methane. was demonstrated in previous works at lab scale, avoiding cracks generation or delamination of the selective film [36,40]. Influence of main operating conditions for the membrane reactor when feeding ethanol or methane: (a) temperature, (b) steam to feed hydrocarbon ratio and (c) total retentate pressure.…”
Section: Preliminary Membrane Reactor Design: Modeling and Main Operamentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To enhance these attributes even further, some other new technologies include microreactors, some of which use foam-like porous catalysts, in the steam reforming of ethanol [128,129], dimethyl ether [130,131] or phenol [132]; and membrane reactors, for the steam reforming of methanol [133], ethanol [134] or glycerol [135]. However, in general terms these approaches are not as efficient as traditional systems, in terms of conversion, H2 yield and future scaling-up [136].…”
Section: Off-line Reformingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rossetti et al [10] calculated the equilibrium compositions of the ethanol steam reforming at different conditions and estimated their kinetic model parameters. Hedayati et al [11] conducted dynamic simulation of ethanol steam reforming for hydrogen production in a catalytic membrane reactor. Serra et al [12] developed a nonlinear dynamic model and conducted a static-dynamic analysis for the ethanol steam reforming with membrane separation process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%