2016 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/aim.2016.7576979
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic simulation of a hydraulic exoskeleton robot based on virtual prototyping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar studies also include References [ 35 , 36 ]. Ding et al [ 37 ] developed a virtual prototype of a hydraulic exoskeleton robot in simulation software ADAMS (automatic dynamic analysis of mechanical systems) and analyzed its dynamic behaviors. The results were consistent with those obtained from real-world experiments.…”
Section: Background Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar studies also include References [ 35 , 36 ]. Ding et al [ 37 ] developed a virtual prototype of a hydraulic exoskeleton robot in simulation software ADAMS (automatic dynamic analysis of mechanical systems) and analyzed its dynamic behaviors. The results were consistent with those obtained from real-world experiments.…”
Section: Background Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, SolidWorks, a well‐known CAD software, was used to design 3D lower limb exoskeleton, that is, portable assistive devices (Ding & Ouyang, 2016). The simulation study of the 3D design of a lower limb exoskeleton was found cost‐effective and useful in improving the efficiency of assistive devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Spada (2018) evaluated the performance of the chairless exoskeleton in the simulated environment. Several experiments were carried out in a simulated environment (Bosch & van Eck, 2016; Deng & Wang, 2017; Ding & Ouyang, 2016; Fournier & Sm, 2017; Mir‐Nasiri & Jo, 2017; Shepherd & Rouse, 2017; Zhang & Liu, 2017). The performance of the lower limb exoskeleton's 3D design in a simulated environment was not evaluated or studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%