2019
DOI: 10.1111/rssb.12325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Shrinkage Processes

Abstract: Summary We propose a novel class of dynamic shrinkage processes for Bayesian time series and regression analysis. Building on a global–local framework of prior construction, in which continuous scale mixtures of Gaussian distributions are employed for both desirable shrinkage properties and computational tractability, we model dependence between the local scale parameters. The resulting processes inherit the desirable shrinkage behaviour of popular global–local priors, such as the horseshoe prior, but provide … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
90
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
(174 reference statements)
1
90
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, p, and is scaled by p −1/2 following Piironen and Vehtari (2016). The horseshoe prior and its variants have been successful in a variety of models and applications, including functional regression (Kowal et al, 2017b;Kowal, 2018).…”
Section: Shrinkage Priorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, p, and is scaled by p −1/2 following Piironen and Vehtari (2016). The horseshoe prior and its variants have been successful in a variety of models and applications, including functional regression (Kowal et al, 2017b;Kowal, 2018).…”
Section: Shrinkage Priorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following Kowal et al . (), the distribution for {θi(τ)logr} is equivalent to the distribution for θi(τ) under the model ZiPG(τ)=θi(τ)+νi(τ), where ZiPG(τ){Zi(τ)r}{2ξi(τ)}+logr,[νi(τ)ξi(τ)]indepN(0,ξi1(τ)), and ξi(τ)iidnormalPnormalG(Zi(τ)+r,0) is a Pólya‐Gamma random variable.…”
Section: Mcmc Sampling Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, their methods are more demanding than the Kalman filter methods used in our paper since they require stochastic optimization and the evaluation of the stochastic volatility likelihood using a particle filter. We use a much simpler (albeit approximate) approach based on the transformed stochastic volatility model given in (20) and (21). This state-space model has measurement variance log (ǫ 2 t )…”
Section: (B22)mentioning
confidence: 99%