2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2012.02.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic service placement and replication framework to enhance service availability using team formation algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, in [27], failure detection is implemented together with failure mitigation (recovery) in a process called Fault Injection. This process aims to evaluate the framework capacity to handle failover possibilities.…”
Section: Failure Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in [27], failure detection is implemented together with failure mitigation (recovery) in a process called Fault Injection. This process aims to evaluate the framework capacity to handle failover possibilities.…”
Section: Failure Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The framework issues a replication decision on another server host when the predicted response time exceeds 90% of the SLA time without considering the arrival rate. The authors in [22] have suggested a framework for dynamic placement of service and service replication to improve the availability of services using a team formation algorithm. The framework concentrates on cost management, performance, and availability in the event of web service failover and does not consider the arrival rate and International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks 3 response time while replicating the web service.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the main aims of replication is to provide availability as discussed in (Wenbing 2007 ; Liang and Bin 2010 ; Ooi et al 2012 ). In addition, it also improves the performance of the entire system that the different Web services operate on (Keidl et al 2003 ; You et al 2009 ; Björkqvist et al 2012 ).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%