2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11277-016-3849-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Self-Optimization of the Antenna Tilt for Best Trade-off Between Coverage and Capacity in Mobile Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the operational stage, self-optimization (a.k.a. selftuning) schemes [5], [7], [14], [39]- [45] take advantage of live measurements to dynamically adapt network parameters to changing network conditions. For this purpose, a controller iteratively modifies network parameters based on continuous performance measurements (e.g., cell load or inter-cell interference) without the need for a network model.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the operational stage, self-optimization (a.k.a. selftuning) schemes [5], [7], [14], [39]- [45] take advantage of live measurements to dynamically adapt network parameters to changing network conditions. For this purpose, a controller iteratively modifies network parameters based on continuous performance measurements (e.g., cell load or inter-cell interference) without the need for a network model.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, a controller iteratively modifies network parameters based on continuous performance measurements (e.g., cell load or inter-cell interference) without the need for a network model. The controller can be an equation solver [5], [39], a local search algorithm [7], [40], a heuristic rule-based controller [14], [41] or an adaptive controller adjusted by reinforcement learning [42]- [45]. These can be implemented as a centralized entity to reduce communication overhead or as a distributed entity to share computational load among base stations.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results on simulated data demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms a fixed strategy for the antenna tilts. A similar approach is taken by the authors of [4], where reinforcement learning is again used to optimize the antenna tilts, this time with the objective of maximizing the overall data rate of the network. Finally, the work in [5] proposes a general machine learning-based network planning tool.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors of [85] focus on the problem of self-optimization in the LTE network environment by adjusting antenna tilt and show that this approach is more efficient than supervised learning and Q-learning algorithms in terms of self-healing performance and multiple coverage problems. The authors in [86] add dynamic and adaptive antenna tilt adjustment for the best trade-off between coverage and capacity in mobile networks. This approach is based on RL methodology with low computational complexity for distributed real-time operation.…”
Section: Antenna Tilt Approach (Directional Antenna)mentioning
confidence: 99%