2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-23068-4_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Scientific Co-Authorship Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
11

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
0
41
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…20 Coauthor networks within an institution can represent relationships and connections with people, as well as the potential for flow of information, reputation, and plans for future collaboration. 21 Social capital theory holds that relationship ties within an individual's social network provide access to assets, advice, opportunities and information. 22 These connections may be particularly important for junior faculty as they build their scientific careers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 Coauthor networks within an institution can represent relationships and connections with people, as well as the potential for flow of information, reputation, and plans for future collaboration. 21 Social capital theory holds that relationship ties within an individual's social network provide access to assets, advice, opportunities and information. 22 These connections may be particularly important for junior faculty as they build their scientific careers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a co-author network can be regarded as a special type of social network, Social Network Analysis (SNA) methods are applicable. For example, SNA oriented methods such as graph partitioning [21], blockmodeling [22], and modularity based optimization methods [23] have been applied to analyze the co-author network in the previous studies [12,24]. With regard to computational efficiency and ease of visualization, we utilized the modularity base method to identify the research communities.…”
Section: Methodology and Softwarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different from traditional interpretive reviews, the bibliometric method and SNA are data-driven analyses that expose the hidden structures of a domain by data mining the literature, examples of metrics derived from these techniques include the H-index [9], co-word network [10], co-cited references or co-cited authors [11], and the social networks of co-authors [12]. Research using these methods have been conducted in many earth science related disciplines, including discipline level analyses of Geographic Information System (GIS) development [13], transport geography [14], and topical level analysis of Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) [15] and geo-ontology [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Börner, Sanyal and Vespignani (2007) review network science, an interdisciplinary field "concerned with the study of networks, be they biological, technological, or scholarly in character" (p. 537). Mali et al (2012) classified the levels of analysis of scientific collaboration and analyzed the dynamic co-authorship networks with a view to model them. Watts (2003) and Moody (2004) studied the structure of social networks and social science collaboration networks while Hou, Kretschmer and Liu (2008) focused more specifically on the collaboration between scientometricians at macro level and mapped the co-authorship network of scientometricians using social network analysis.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%