2014
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.89.054307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic scaling at classical phase transitions approached through nonequilibrium quenching

Abstract: We use Monte Carlo simulations to demonstrate generic scaling aspects of classical phase transitions approached through a quench (or annealing) protocol where the temperature changes as a function of time with velocity v. Using a generalized Kibble-Zurek ansatz, we demonstrate dynamic scaling for different types of stochastic dynamics (Metropolis, Swendsen-Wang, and Wolff) on Ising models in two and higher dimensions. We show that there are dual scaling functions governing the dynamic scaling, which together d… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
106
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(173 reference statements)
12
106
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, at T > 0 transitions, in both nonrandom and spin-glass models [12,20,21], the dynamic exponent is finite and takes the same value at equilibrium and in SA analyzed within the KZ hypothesis. Clearly the source of this difference lays in the fact that the equilibrium dynamics is nonergodic in the limit T → 0.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast, at T > 0 transitions, in both nonrandom and spin-glass models [12,20,21], the dynamic exponent is finite and takes the same value at equilibrium and in SA analyzed within the KZ hypothesis. Clearly the source of this difference lays in the fact that the equilibrium dynamics is nonergodic in the limit T → 0.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) by replacing L by ξ v . Thus, we conclude that, unlike other cases studied so far [20,44], here f 0 (vL z+1/ν ) is not Taylorexpandable but a corresponding functionf 0 (L/ξ v ) is. We do not have an explanation for this apparently different analytic form of the scaling function in this case, but empirically the evidence is compelling, as seen more directly in Fig.…”
Section: Order Parametermentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations