2003
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1084-0702(2003)8:1(46)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Response of Suspension Bridge to High Wind and Running Train

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
28
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The details of all the matrices in Eq. (12) can be found in Xu et al (2003). Equation (12) is actually the second order linear non-homogeneous differential equation with time-varying coeffi cients.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The details of all the matrices in Eq. (12) can be found in Xu et al (2003). Equation (12) is actually the second order linear non-homogeneous differential equation with time-varying coeffi cients.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(6) and (7), the buffeting forces acting on the bridge deck can be determined and the modal buffeting forces can then be obtained for the dynamic analysis of a coupled train-bridge system in cross winds. The drag, lift, and moment coeffi cients of the bridge deck measured from wind tunnel tests are 0.135, 0.090, and 0.063, respectively, at the zero wind angle of attack with respect to the deck width of 41 m (Xu et al, 2003). The fi rst derivatives of the drag, lift, and moment coeffi cients with respect to wind angle at the zero wind angle of attack are −0.253, 1.324, and 0.278, respectively.…”
Section: Simulation Of Wind Forces On Bridgementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the simulation of buffeting forces, the following longitudinal and vertical wind spectra are adopted [9] where f (z) = nz /U(z), u * is the friction velocity of the wind. For lack of measured data available from the wind tunnel test for this bridge, the drag C Di , lift C Li and moment coefficient C Mi of the bridge deck are taken as 0.135, 0.090 and 0.063, respectively, according to the measured data for the Tsing Ma Bridge in Hong Kong; The first derivatives of the drag, lift and moment coefficients are −0.253, 1.324, and 0.278, respectively, with respect to zero wind attack angle [10]. According to the feature of the wind at the bridge, the mean wind velocity is taken in the range of 0-40 m/s.…”
Section: Simulation Of Wind Velocitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With these types of bridges, when the length of the span is increased, their behavior becomes more complex and structural characteristics such as stiffness, external forces and dynamic stability, are even more important to evaluate structural reliability and safety [1]. With large spans, the cable-stayed bridges are more sensitive to flutter instability, wind, earthquakes and traffic-induced vibrations, where highly nonlinear behavior and structural coupling between cables and bridge deck, are some of the specific and complex problems to solve [2]. At the same time, many long bridges are located where adverse environment and strong winds are present; conditions that may cause large deflections and considerable vibrations on cablestayed bridges by buffeting and self-excited forces [3], causing fatigue and structural deterioration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%