2022
DOI: 10.1155/2022/7508023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Response of Bridge‐Landslide Parallel System under Earthquake

Abstract: In order to further understand the instability mechanism and geohazard causation when the main sliding path of the slope body is parallel to the path of the bridge, the corresponding bridge-landslide parallel system is constructed for shaking table tests. This paper summarizes the combination forms of bridge-landslide model under different position and focused on the slope body located above the bridge deck. Firstly, based on the shaking table test results of El Centro (1940), the failure behavior of bridge-la… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e most common seismic design method of continuous-girder bridges is to set multiple seismic isolation bearings. Many studies have been conducted on damping measures, such as damping isolation bearings and viscous dampers for continuous-girder bridges, and many research results have been achieved [1][2][3]. However, regardless of the type of isolation bearings adopted, a large relative displacement must be applied to accomplish the ideal damping e ect [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e most common seismic design method of continuous-girder bridges is to set multiple seismic isolation bearings. Many studies have been conducted on damping measures, such as damping isolation bearings and viscous dampers for continuous-girder bridges, and many research results have been achieved [1][2][3]. However, regardless of the type of isolation bearings adopted, a large relative displacement must be applied to accomplish the ideal damping e ect [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%