2020
DOI: 10.1155/2020/6635378
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Response Analysis of Retaining Dam under the Impact of Solid-Liquid Two-Phase Debris Flow Based on the Coupled SPH-DEM-FEM Method

Abstract: Based on the coupled SPH-DEM-FEM numerical method, this paper analyzes the dynamic interaction of solid debris flow particle-liquid debris flow slurry-retaining dam in order to explore the dynamic response of retaining dam under the impact of the solid-liquid two-phase debris flow and delves into the process of the debris flow impact on the dam, the impact force of debris flow, and the elastic-plastic time-history characteristics of the dam under different slopes of trapezoidal grooves. The calculation results… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…is is because when the slope of the channel is sharp, the gravitational potential energy of debris flow is relatively large, and once the debris flow takes shape, the kinetic energy and impulsive force produced by debris flow will be far greater than when the slope is small. Li et al [32] explore the impulsive force and dynamic performance of rigid retaining structure impacted by debris flow by adopting the SPH-DEM-FEM method. By comparing impulsive force and dynamic performance of flexible retaining structure impacted by solid-liquid two-phase debris flow discussed in this paper, the dynamic performance and impact characteristics of flexible retaining structure and rigid retaining structure are quite different.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…is is because when the slope of the channel is sharp, the gravitational potential energy of debris flow is relatively large, and once the debris flow takes shape, the kinetic energy and impulsive force produced by debris flow will be far greater than when the slope is small. Li et al [32] explore the impulsive force and dynamic performance of rigid retaining structure impacted by debris flow by adopting the SPH-DEM-FEM method. By comparing impulsive force and dynamic performance of flexible retaining structure impacted by solid-liquid two-phase debris flow discussed in this paper, the dynamic performance and impact characteristics of flexible retaining structure and rigid retaining structure are quite different.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e rugged topography in the ditch is sharp, the gullies can be found anywhere, and the slope of the main ditch formation area is 19 °∼47 °, which belong to a vast debris flow ditch. e detailed geological information of Nanjiaogou can be found in [32].…”
Section: Calculation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Lee and Jeong [11], Lee et al [21], Jeong and Lee [25], and Lee et al [26] adopted the coupled Euler-Lagrange (CEL) method to compare the test results with the debris flow disasters that have occurred, verifying the applicability of the coupled numerical analysis method. Li et al [27], Liu et al [28], and Liu et al [29], respectively, adopted the coupled numerical methods SPH-DEM, SPH-FEM, and DEM-FEM to investigate the dynamic response of the debris flow process model and the retaining structure. The above numerical simulation results provided the theoretical basis for considering the fluid-particle debris flow mixture of the process model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%