2014
DOI: 10.5137/1019-5149.jtn.9784-13.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic radiographic results of different semi-rigid lumbar fusion devices for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: “dynamic rod” vs. “dynamic screw head”

Abstract: These outcomes may play a role in decreasing the risk of ASD after dynamic stabilization, at least 2 years after surgery.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…How to overcome the shortcomings of rigid fixation with pedicle screws, maintain the stability of the spine while preserving the physiologic function of a fused segment part, and reduce the incidence of ASD has become a major focus of research interest [ 3 , 6 ]. In recent years, new techniques and methods, such as non-fusion fixation of the spine [ 7 , 8 ], minimally invasive endoscopic surgery of the spine [ 9 , 10 ], and artificial disk replacement, have been introduced [ 11 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…How to overcome the shortcomings of rigid fixation with pedicle screws, maintain the stability of the spine while preserving the physiologic function of a fused segment part, and reduce the incidence of ASD has become a major focus of research interest [ 3 , 6 ]. In recent years, new techniques and methods, such as non-fusion fixation of the spine [ 7 , 8 ], minimally invasive endoscopic surgery of the spine [ 9 , 10 ], and artificial disk replacement, have been introduced [ 11 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, x-ray-based diagnostic imaging techniques measuring human inter-vertebral displacements have focused mostly on imaging the spine at static end-of-range positions [ 32 40 ]. However, qualitative and quantitative assessments of spinal motion have been enhanced by quantitative radiographic techniques that track displacements of pre-assigned coordinate points of specific anatomic locations on orthographic spinal images and by real-time joint-motion evaluation with XROMM-like techniques (using CT/magnetic-resonance-imaging-based 3-D models) and RSA (with per-operative implanted vertebral markers) in human subjects [ 22 , 28 , 38 , 41 47 ]. Regrettably, these approaches still require exposure to ionizing radiation and, at times, require marker implantation on the bones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%