2011 IEEE 73rd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/vetecs.2011.5956356
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Quantification of Activity Recognition Capabilities in Opportunistic Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In that sense, it could be more suitable for dynamic classifier ensembles -where sensors (and their corresponding trained classifiers (Kurz et al, 2011a;Calatroni et al, 2011)) -may be added or removed from the network on runtime. Having said so, in this approach the length of the window should be carefully chosen in order to have a reasonable estimate of the mutual information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In that sense, it could be more suitable for dynamic classifier ensembles -where sensors (and their corresponding trained classifiers (Kurz et al, 2011a;Calatroni et al, 2011)) -may be added or removed from the network on runtime. Having said so, in this approach the length of the window should be carefully chosen in order to have a reasonable estimate of the mutual information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This measure can then be used to dynamically reconfigure the ensemble, taking into account different specifications including classification performance, as well as communication costs or energy consumption (Kurz et al, 2011b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is particularly important as it simplifies the computation of the score; moreover, it reduces the amount of information that has to be stored to characterize potential ensembles. In the case of an architecture relying on nodes self-descriptions, as proposed by Kurz et al [12], each node has to store only its mutual information with respect to other sensors instead of all the possible node combination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent approach has been proposed to support this aspect by relying on nodes that are able to self-describe themselves and advertise their capabilities (e.g. activities they are able to recognize) [12]. Accordingly, upon the appearance of a new node, its selfdescription information can be used to include it into the pool of available classifiers and decide whether it should be part of the ensemble (i.e.…”
Section: E Ensemble Reconfigurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly the development in ambient sensors to recognize the physical as well as cognitive aspects has progressed well beyond the video and audio streams analysis and has entered into implicit interaction paradigm [128,130]. General purpose sensing architectures have been developed, serving multi-purpose, multi-sensor, spontaneous and opportunistic sensing missions [66,[82][83][84].…”
Section: Exploiting Social Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%