2006
DOI: 10.1109/jlt.2006.879505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic provisioning of availability-constrained optical circuits in the presence of optical node failures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also show that ignoring the dependence between link failures can lead to suboptimal solutions of our network design problem. We tested our model over the Italian WDM backbone network, extracted from [18], where the marginal failure probabilities p e are computed as a function of the length of each link. Inspired by [8], we introduced a correlation using the distance d ef between the midpoint of a pair of links e and f , given by ρ ef = exp(−θ d ef ) rounded to the first decimal and using θ = 2.…”
Section: Computational Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We also show that ignoring the dependence between link failures can lead to suboptimal solutions of our network design problem. We tested our model over the Italian WDM backbone network, extracted from [18], where the marginal failure probabilities p e are computed as a function of the length of each link. Inspired by [8], we introduced a correlation using the distance d ef between the midpoint of a pair of links e and f , given by ρ ef = exp(−θ d ef ) rounded to the first decimal and using θ = 2.…”
Section: Computational Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…maximum allowable, keeping the same marginal failure probabilities for all links. We repeat this procedure increasing correlation between links (0, 2) and (0, 3), links (6,8) and (3,7), and links (12,14) and (14,18). We denote these instances as I2, I3 and I4, respectively.…”
Section: Computational Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean time to failure (MTTF) and mean time to repair (MTTR) values of each component can be obtained from the literature [9]- [11]. Note that the link failure rate is considered to be directly proportional to the length of the fiber link, and the OXC node failure rate is proportional to the degree of the node, whereas the mean repair time of nodes and links are independent of the links' lengths and nodes' degrees, respectively [12]. In this paper, since the probability that three components have overlapped (in time) failures is small enough to be ignored, 2 the assumption that at most two components fail at the same time is made.…”
Section: Failure Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The connection source and destination nodes are randomly (uniform distribution) selected. According to [9]- [12], the nodes' (transmitter, receiver, OXC node, and OEO converter) MTTR is 6 hours, and the links' MTTR is 12 hours. The failure rate in FIT (1 FIT = 1 failure in 10 9 hours) is shown in Table I.…”
Section: A Simulation Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dynamic ones must establish the working/backup lightpaths on demand and thus, there is not much time to compute the lightpath allocation. For that reason, heuristics are the most used approach to solve the problem, as in [10,13,16,20]. In a static scenario instead, the set of connections to establish are known a priori and there is enough time to run optimization techniques such as integer linear programming (ILP) models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%