2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2020.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic protein interfaces and conformational landscapes of membrane protein complexes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Potentially, one could also have included the BECN1-BH3D into the 2ABO-apo state within the same simulation box in order to monitor the conformational states as well as mechanisms that ar involved in the binding process. Although such studies for elucidating the binding mechanisms of other protein–protein interactions are common [ 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 ], we note that the size of the simulation box and solvation conditions could have a pronounced effect in terms of drawing scientific conclusions. Further, a recent study by Gapsys and de Groot [ 58 ] also highlighted the importance of considering box width and volume for accurate sampling and estimating kinetics and other relevant parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Potentially, one could also have included the BECN1-BH3D into the 2ABO-apo state within the same simulation box in order to monitor the conformational states as well as mechanisms that ar involved in the binding process. Although such studies for elucidating the binding mechanisms of other protein–protein interactions are common [ 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 ], we note that the size of the simulation box and solvation conditions could have a pronounced effect in terms of drawing scientific conclusions. Further, a recent study by Gapsys and de Groot [ 58 ] also highlighted the importance of considering box width and volume for accurate sampling and estimating kinetics and other relevant parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In solution, proteins fluctuate among many different structures, known also as conformations or conformational substates. [ 29–32 ] A useful framework for understanding this ensemble of conformations is the free‐energy landscape, [ 33–35 ] in which the energy minima represent different conformations and the energy barriers between them dictate the kinetics of conformational exchange. Free‐energy landscapes are multidimensional, [ 36 ] but they are often depicted in only two dimensions for conceptual understanding ( Figure 2 a).…”
Section: Dynamic Energy Landscapes Are Biased Toward the Functionallymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the success of MD simulations is based on the data from the X-ray crystal structure analyses of proteins. Current MD methods can be efficiently employed for proteins with well-packed, stable folds; however, there are many challenges for their use with unstable proteins with structures that are difficult to be analyzed by experiments, e.g., dynamic features of dimerized transmembrane helices 19 and intrinsically disordered proteins. 20 Further validations of this methodology with direct comparison with experimental observations are required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%