2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-19857-6_55
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic-Programming–Based Method for Fixation-to-Word Mapping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cost function is based on the length of reading segments and document text lines to determine whether a reading line matches a document line. Our experiments demonstrate that the proposed method, as a preparatory step, yields 87% accuracy in naïve distance-based fixation-to-word mapping (up from 69% of pure naïve method, and 72.3% of the previous method without transition classification [16]). Based on this result, we believe our method to be a potentially valuable instrument in the processing of gaze data from reading activities.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The cost function is based on the length of reading segments and document text lines to determine whether a reading line matches a document line. Our experiments demonstrate that the proposed method, as a preparatory step, yields 87% accuracy in naïve distance-based fixation-to-word mapping (up from 69% of pure naïve method, and 72.3% of the previous method without transition classification [16]). Based on this result, we believe our method to be a potentially valuable instrument in the processing of gaze data from reading activities.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Although this method achieved feasible accuracy, the precision of the word-level error correction was relatively less. Our previous study [16] considered sequential consecutive fixations, inspired by Carl's [3] dynamic programming-based approach, and associated sequential fixations with a text line to reduce the vertical misplacement of the gaze position. Although our previous study obtained better accuracy compared with manual annotation, it may not perform well in the presence of long-range regressions or skimming events.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Then, the vertical error is coarsely estimated and the fixation lines are matched with the text lines. In the next section, we present the algorithm proposed by Yamaya et al [15] for correcting the vertical error and compare it to our method. After this, we show through the experiments that we can align 69 % of the eye gaze lines with their corresponding text lines and compare the results with the state-of-the-art method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%