2014
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.89.062108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic phase transitions in simple driven kinetic networks

Abstract: We analyze the probability distribution for entropy production rates of trajectories evolving on a class of out-of-equilibrium kinetic networks. These networks can serve as simple models for driven dynamical systems, where energy fluxes typically result in non-equilibrium dynamics. By analyzing the fluctuations in the entropy production, we demonstrate the emergence, in a large system size limit, of a dynamic phase transition between two distinct dynamical regimes.The study of fluctuation phenomena is one of t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
76
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(34 reference statements)
4
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 suggests that the first slope maximum in ATP-bound Src's rate curve (related to the first peak of χ ω ) corresponds to the transition between the near-equilibrium and dissipative regimes; the second, less dramatic maximum seems to be related to a transition between the two prominent peaks within the dissipative regime. In comparison with fully nonequilibrium systems, these crossovers are reminiscent of "dynamical phase transitions" that have been observed between different regimes of dissipation in simple, driven networks (10,11,32). The response function peaks we observe here only occur within transient relaxation dynamics, and thus do not represent true phase transitions in the thermodynamic limit.…”
mentioning
confidence: 52%
“…2 suggests that the first slope maximum in ATP-bound Src's rate curve (related to the first peak of χ ω ) corresponds to the transition between the near-equilibrium and dissipative regimes; the second, less dramatic maximum seems to be related to a transition between the two prominent peaks within the dissipative regime. In comparison with fully nonequilibrium systems, these crossovers are reminiscent of "dynamical phase transitions" that have been observed between different regimes of dissipation in simple, driven networks (10,11,32). The response function peaks we observe here only occur within transient relaxation dynamics, and thus do not represent true phase transitions in the thermodynamic limit.…”
mentioning
confidence: 52%
“…In particular, it will be interesting to see if these results change for receptors modeled by heterogeneous Markov networks that are not strictly ringlike in nature. Recent work indicates that at large entropy production the dynamics of such networks may be independent of details of the underlying topology, suggesting that our basic picture should hold even for more complicated nonequilibrium receptors [35]. An additional extension to our model would be to consider externally varying concentrations by implementing a sensory adaptive system (SAS) as was done in recent papers [36,37].…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important observation is that the bounds on fluctuations of a counting observable and its FPTs are controlled by the average dynamical activity, in analogy to the role played by the entropy production in the case of currents [1,13]. We hope these results will add to the growing body of work applying large deviation ideas and methods to the study of dynamics in driven systems [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41], glasses [25,[42][43][44][45][46][47], protein folding and signaling networks [48][49][50][51], open quantum systems [52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64], and many other problems in nonequilibrium [65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%