2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2006.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic performance of accommodating intraocular lenses in a negative feedback control system: A simulation-based study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Increased neural effort to mold an aging crystalline lens is suggested by an increase in the response AC/A ratio and a decrease in the response CA/C ratio within the linear range of the accommodative stimulus–response function (Fincham, 1951). However, in contradiction to the expected increase in near-pupillary constriction, Kasthurirangan and Glasser (2006) observed no change or even a slight reduction in the magnitude of monocular near-pupillary constriction between 14 and 45-yr-old subjects—an age range over which there is a dramatic reduction in the compliance of the crystalline lens (Schor, Bharadwaj, & Burns, 2007; Weeber et al, 2005). This suggests that differences in neural effort to achieve the accommodative response may contribute only little to the increased Δpd of adults.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Increased neural effort to mold an aging crystalline lens is suggested by an increase in the response AC/A ratio and a decrease in the response CA/C ratio within the linear range of the accommodative stimulus–response function (Fincham, 1951). However, in contradiction to the expected increase in near-pupillary constriction, Kasthurirangan and Glasser (2006) observed no change or even a slight reduction in the magnitude of monocular near-pupillary constriction between 14 and 45-yr-old subjects—an age range over which there is a dramatic reduction in the compliance of the crystalline lens (Schor, Bharadwaj, & Burns, 2007; Weeber et al, 2005). This suggests that differences in neural effort to achieve the accommodative response may contribute only little to the increased Δpd of adults.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Studies relying on static measurements require a separate recording for each individual accommodative demand, which typically limits these studies to measurements at few accommodative states in 1 D or 2 D step increments. Being able to evaluate the dynamics of accommodation can be useful in understanding the closed-loop system that drives ciliary muscle contraction based on retinal image cues [ 43 ]. The system can be programmed to present accommodation stimuli other than ramp and step types, including rectangular or sinusoidal stimuli.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combined system presented in this manuscript can dynamically measure the refraction and biometry changes that occur in accommodation. An effective accommodation restoration technique will need to be evaluated dynamically in natural accommodation [ 43 ]. For instance, dynamic imaging studies of accommodating IOLs (aIOL) demonstrated the lack of interaction of the ciliary muscle with the aIOL to induce accommodation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 Although many investigators have observed a contraction and matrix remodeling of the post-surgical capsule that reflects altered mechanics, few computational studies have focused on the effects of cataract surgery on the capsule and all such studies have assumed normal tissue mechanics. 13,22,29 We submit that there is a pressing need to model the evolving geometry, structure, and properties of the lens capsule following cataract surgery, which is a prerequisite for understanding capsule-implant interactions. Such modeling can be initiated by borrowing ideas from other areas of soft tissue growth and remodeling (G&R) mechanics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%