2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10951-014-0407-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic patient admission scheduling with operating room constraints, flexible horizons, and patient delays

Abstract: We revisit and extend the patient admission scheduling problem, in order to make it suitable for practical applications. The main novelty is that we consider constraints on the utilisation of operating rooms for patients requiring a surgery. In addition, we propose a more elaborate model that includes a flexible planning horizon, a complex notion of patient delay, and new components of the objective function. We design a solution approach based on local search, which explores the search space using a composite… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A patient admission scheduling benchmark set (Bilgin et al 2012) has been generated on the basis of a single reallife instance from Demeester et al (2010). Since only limited real-life data were available, Ceschia and Schaerf (2016) presented a benchmark set for patient admission scheduling, together with an instance generator, solution validator, and first solutions. The instances are generated based on randomly generated theoretical case mixes.…”
Section: Benchmark Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A patient admission scheduling benchmark set (Bilgin et al 2012) has been generated on the basis of a single reallife instance from Demeester et al (2010). Since only limited real-life data were available, Ceschia and Schaerf (2016) presented a benchmark set for patient admission scheduling, together with an instance generator, solution validator, and first solutions. The instances are generated based on randomly generated theoretical case mixes.…”
Section: Benchmark Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for healthcare scheduling problems only a few benchmark sets exist, and no benchmark sets have been developed for surgery scheduling problems. The patient admission scheduling set of Ceschia and Schaerf (2016) is the closest to a surgery scheduling benchmark set available. An effective benchmark set should satisfy four conditions: diversity, realism, size, and extensibility.…”
Section: Conditions For Benchmark Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This results in an infeasible solution, violating either the requirement that a patient be admitted before his/her maximal admission date or the requirement that there is a fixed number of days in the planning horizon. To be comparable to Ceschia and Schaerf [12], these infeasibilities receive an extra penalty of 200 per occurrence to ensure that they are quickly remedied during the optimization process.…”
Section: The Dynamic Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vancroonenburg et al [10] present two ILPs for dynamic versions of the six smallest data sets given in Demeester et al [6], and consider the impact of emergency patients and patient length of stay estimates. More recently, Ceschia and Schaerf [12] have extended the work of Ceschia and Schaerf [11] to also consider the scheduling of operating theaters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A patient admission scheduling benchmark set [35] has been generated on the basis of a single real-life instance from Demeester et al [83]. Since only limited real life data was available, Ceschia and Schaerf [61] presented a benchmark set for patient admission scheduling, together with an instance generator, solution validator, and first solutions. The instances are generated based on randomly generated theoretical case mixes.…”
Section: Benchmark Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%