2021
DOI: 10.1109/les.2020.3004302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Partial Reconfiguration Profitability for Real-Time Systems

Abstract: Modern Field-Programmable Gate Arrays offer Dynamic Partial Reconfiguration (DPR) capabilities, a characteristic that opens new scheduling opportunities for real-time applications running on heterogeneous platforms. To evaluate when it is really useful to exploit a DPR, in this letter we present the characterization of its reconfiguration cost in terms of time and a definition of the "DPR Profitability" concept targeting real-time systems. To obtain such results, the components involved in a DPR process have b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They applied these results in the development of a runtime reconfiguration support under WCET guarantees. Valente et al [10] proposed a detailed characterization of the components involved in the reconfiguration in order to provide a worst-case bound on the cost. This result allowed them to define the profitability of the DPR reconfiguration in real-time systems.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They applied these results in the development of a runtime reconfiguration support under WCET guarantees. Valente et al [10] proposed a detailed characterization of the components involved in the reconfiguration in order to provide a worst-case bound on the cost. This result allowed them to define the profitability of the DPR reconfiguration in real-time systems.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The run-time spatial-temporal exploitation of FPGA compute resources requires certain applications to fulfill some strict latency requirements in order not to suffer service downtimes. Different works tried to improve the PR latency and reconfiguration control overheads [9][10][11]. Another major setback for more widespread use of the PR methods is concerns related to data privacy and security when FPGA devices are used as shared computing resources in multi-tenant edge or cloud applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of the advantages of DPR systems compared to static logic systems, their complexity is a significant drawback in their implementation [20]. The recurrent issue designers must deal with when designing DPR systems is the difficulty to assert its behavioral characteristics in the application domain, such as the reconfiguration time [21], performance [22], power efficiency [23], and its impact on the device as a whole. This work makes use of a high-level modeling tool for DPR System of Chips (SoCs), named RTRLib [24], allowing non-expert users to develop run-time reconfigurable applications.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%