2007
DOI: 10.1134/s1063780x07090036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic parameters of the dipole layer formed during pulsed photoemission discharging of a plane vacuum diode

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was shown in [3] that for obliquely incident laser radiation and when the condition T 0 /T p ∞ is ful filled, the maximum energy of electrons leaving the discharge gap depends on the angle of incidence θ of 2m/eϕ 0 laser radiation: ε = eϕ 0 cos 2 θ. This leads to a decrease in the wave amplitude proportional to cos 2 θ and a decrease in the electromagnetic energy flux density over the anode in proportion to cos 4 θ.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was shown in [3] that for obliquely incident laser radiation and when the condition T 0 /T p ∞ is ful filled, the maximum energy of electrons leaving the discharge gap depends on the angle of incidence θ of 2m/eϕ 0 laser radiation: ε = eϕ 0 cos 2 θ. This leads to a decrease in the wave amplitude proportional to cos 2 θ and a decrease in the electromagnetic energy flux density over the anode in proportion to cos 4 θ.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our bound on the radiated energy also includes the size scale of the diode as a parameter. It is not possible to derive a single bound for more complete models and calculations of charges and currents in vacuum diodes 12,13 (these authors did not calculate the emitted radiation), because they must be described by several independent parameters. A quantitative bound would require optimization over a several-dimensional parameter space; its origin would not be apparent and its numerical value would depend on detailed geometric assumptions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%