2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprocont.2019.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic optimization of processes with time varying hydraulic delays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…25,26 In addition to constant input delay, integral type delay has also been the object of further study because of its application in temperature dynamics, spark-ignited models, 27 and fluid-transport phenomena. 28 A specific example is hydraulic delays, 29,30 which depend on the past input value via a specific integration approach; such systems with integral delays can be stabilized through an iterative algorithm 29,30 or the backstepping method. 31 More recently, the control design for PDEs with spatially distributed delays has attracted new attention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25,26 In addition to constant input delay, integral type delay has also been the object of further study because of its application in temperature dynamics, spark-ignited models, 27 and fluid-transport phenomena. 28 A specific example is hydraulic delays, 29,30 which depend on the past input value via a specific integration approach; such systems with integral delays can be stabilized through an iterative algorithm 29,30 or the backstepping method. 31 More recently, the control design for PDEs with spatially distributed delays has attracted new attention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, up to our knowledge, only a few theoretical studies have investigated control related issues. Notable exceptions are [7] which proposes an heuristic control design in the case of a state delay and [12], [13] which investigate optimal control for a general class of nonlinear systems with both input and state transport delays.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%