2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2017.10.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic optimization of a cryogenic air separation unit using a derivative-free optimization approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The arc ek is noted as Equat meaning the directed arc from vi to vj. And the set of functions φ is denoted as Eq (5), indicating that φ is the sign of arc ek and is taken the values "+" or "−":…”
Section: Signed Directed Graphmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The arc ek is noted as Equat meaning the directed arc from vi to vj. And the set of functions φ is denoted as Eq (5), indicating that φ is the sign of arc ek and is taken the values "+" or "−":…”
Section: Signed Directed Graphmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a multipurpose and maneuverable process simulation method, dynamic simulation is able to accurately reflect the timely response of chemical processes by introducing time variables [4]. Dynamic simulation is frequently used as a substitute for real situation to optimize process system, demonstrate the complex control system scheme, and observe the dynamic changes of the system when faults occur [5]. For instance, dynamic simulation made a great contribution to the proposal of an effective control scheme for the coal pyrolysis wastewater treatment process [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, a proprietary derivative-free algorithm is used to search for the least-costly system. The Pseudo-codes of these two algorithms can be seen in [42] and [43]. The proven superiority of the grid search algorithm in comparing the other optimization algorithm is the capa bility of selecting the best parameters for the optimization problem from the provided list of parameter options [44].…”
Section: E Optimization Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, it is inevitable that the existing RB‐CCD methods consume numerous computational resources to perform the time‐consuming system simulations when encountering the RB‐CCD problem in the sophisticated dynamic system. Moreover, in some practical situations, dynamics models are generated by industrial simulation software or platforms, the state equation is implicit since the state equation expressed by the differential algebraic equations cannot be extracted directly from the models 28 . Although the current RB‐CCD methods can optimize the RB‐CCD problem in the lack of the explicit state equation by using the finite‐difference technique, there is no doubt that the number of system simulations will be further increased, and the computational burden will be further exacerbated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%