2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.joep.2019.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic norms drive sustainable consumption: Norm-based nudging helps café customers to avoid disposable to-go-cups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
80
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
80
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, in a field experiment, patrons waiting in line at a café who completed a survey containing information about a growing number of people who make an effort to eat less meat were twice as likely to order a vegetarian lunch compared to those who only learned about a static norm or a control group (34% as compared to 17% and 21%, respectively). Dynamic norms have also been shown to affect other sustainable behaviors, including reducing water use [9,11] and single-use products [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further, in a field experiment, patrons waiting in line at a café who completed a survey containing information about a growing number of people who make an effort to eat less meat were twice as likely to order a vegetarian lunch compared to those who only learned about a static norm or a control group (34% as compared to 17% and 21%, respectively). Dynamic norms have also been shown to affect other sustainable behaviors, including reducing water use [9,11] and single-use products [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather, it is important to benchmark the value of an intervention by the benefits it produces relative to the costs, as compared to other interventions for similar outcomes [15]. Certainty of effectiveness, potential population impact, feasibility, sustainability, effects on equity, potential side effects, and acceptability Sustainability 2020, 12,2453 3 of 38 have also been identified for judging the promise of a proposed intervention strategy [16]. One can imagine a variety of strategies to reduce meat consumption: infrastructural changes, large-scale educational campaigns, industry-level subsidies for vegetarian options, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low prevalence of the studied behaviors does make them a particularly difficult target for this intervention strategy, as raising the saliency of how rarely these behaviors are practiced can lead to a boomerang effect, where people become less likely to practice them (Cialdini et al, 1991;Ayres et al, 2013). To combat this, a growing body of literature has found that focusing on the change over time of the prevalence of the behavior, rather than the prevalence itself, has been effective in low-prevalence contexts (Sparkman & Walton, 2017;Tankard & Paluck, 2017;Loschelder et al, 2019). Another strategy for promoting behaviors when the prevalence is low but the size of the population is large would be to describe the number of conformers rather than the prevalence rate (saying, for example, that over 200,000 EVs were registered in 2019, rather than 4% of 2019 registrations were EVs).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dynamic form articulates that others are “increasingly” adopting a target behavior. This form has been shown to be effective in promoting PEB such as reducing meat consumption and avoiding disposable to-go cups in cafes [ 37 ]. Subjective social norms (i.e., telling people what others expect them to do) have been effective in reducing waste [ 38 ] and residential water usage [ 39 ].…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, individuals informed about aggregated energy consumption or their neighbor’s recycling behavior have at times adjusted their own behaviors [ 64 66 ]. Moreover, dynamic expressions about others’ use of non-disposable mugs have led to reduced use of to-go cups in cafes [ 37 ].…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%