2010
DOI: 10.1080/18128600902929591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic multi-interval bus travel time prediction using bus transit data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…-nf_ns .] N (3) , p, m , l ' l-l n=l Third, historical travel times are incorporated into the hybrid method. The historical data is retrieved based on certain attributes of the current state such as seasonal, day of the week, time of the day or service characteristics, such as extend of delay or demand levels.…”
Section: Hybrid Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…-nf_ns .] N (3) , p, m , l ' l-l n=l Third, historical travel times are incorporated into the hybrid method. The historical data is retrieved based on certain attributes of the current state such as seasonal, day of the week, time of the day or service characteristics, such as extend of delay or demand levels.…”
Section: Hybrid Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is an extensive literature on applying various statistical and meta-heuristic methods for bus arrival predictions including regression models [3], artificial neural networks [4], Kalman filter [5], support vector machines [6] and Markov chain [7]. While being very efficient, machine learning techniques do not provide a tractable formulation of the prognosis logic which relates predictions to the underlying service mechanisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chang et al. () developed a KNN model to estimate bus travel time; the results proved that the model is effective according to the accuracy and computing time of prediction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other methods including NPR and LR are not so popular, but they are quite simple in calibration and calculation (Park et al 2007;Chang et al 2010;Maiti et at. 2014).…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%