2016
DOI: 10.1080/03637751.2016.1198040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic motivated processing of emotional trajectories in public service announcements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Appeals utilizing both positive and negative emotions are labeled inconsistently in the literature. For example, Hong and Lee [60] and Taute et al [61] employ the term mixed emotional appeals while others utilized the term coactive appeal [7,8,[62][63][64]. The current study employs the term coactive appeals as coactivity is used to explain the mixed state of emotions and is applied more heavily in the marketing communication literature [8,62,64].…”
Section: Positive Negative and Coactive Appealsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Appeals utilizing both positive and negative emotions are labeled inconsistently in the literature. For example, Hong and Lee [60] and Taute et al [61] employ the term mixed emotional appeals while others utilized the term coactive appeal [7,8,[62][63][64]. The current study employs the term coactive appeals as coactivity is used to explain the mixed state of emotions and is applied more heavily in the marketing communication literature [8,62,64].…”
Section: Positive Negative and Coactive Appealsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the LC4MP offers clear predictions about how different message characteristics influence memory for a message. Both cognitive load and the motivational relevance of a message modulate message recognition (Keene & Lang, 2016).…”
Section: Lc4mp Research Domains and Measurement Modalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research testing components of the LC4MP is primarily conducted using self-report, behavioral, and psychophysiological measures (for an overview of the methodological toolbox of the model, see Lang, 2009). Selfreport measures include, for example, valence (Keene & Lang, 2016) and arousal (Clayton, Leshner, Thorson, & Bolls, 2017;Clayton, Ridgway, & Hendrickse, 2017;Keene & Lang, 2016). Behavioral measures are not limited to, but include secondary task reaction time (Clayton, Leshner, Sanders-Jackson, & Hendrickse, 2020;Lang et al, 2006;Lang & Basil, 1998) and signal detection (Shapiro, 1994) procedures.…”
Section: Lc4mp Research Domains and Measurement Modalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While the LC4MP has been successful in predicting how motivational activation in single systems influences information processing, emotion, and memory, less is understood regarding how combinations of appetitive and aversive motivationally relevant content come together to influence these outcomes. A few studies have begun to investigate one class of such content, coactive or ambivalent messages, which contain both appetitive and aversive content in varying amounts (Keene & Lang, 2016; Wang, Solloway, Tchernev, & Barker, 2012). Even fewer studies have examined how multiply-appetitive or multiply-aversive content have functioned (e.g., Leshner, Bolls, & Thomas, 2009; Sparks & Lang, 2015).…”
Section: Dual Motivational Activation: What Do We Know?mentioning
confidence: 99%