2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41746-021-00532-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic models of stress-smoking responses based on high-frequency sensor data

Abstract: Self-reports indicate that stress increases the risk for smoking; however, intensive data from sensors can provide a more nuanced understanding of stress in the moments leading up to and following smoking events. Identifying personalized dynamical models of stress-smoking responses can improve characterizations of smoking responses following stress, but techniques used to identify these models require intensive longitudinal data. This study leveraged advances in wearable sensing technology and digital markers … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, optimization trials can be used to support the evidence-based selection of DTx components (factorial trials) [ 64 - 68 ], refinement of components, particularly those used across time (microrandomized trials) [ 35 , 69 , 70 ], and refinement of adaptation algorithms to match the provision of support to context, individual differences, and timing (microrandomized trials [ 35 , 71 ], and sequential multiple assignment randomized trials [ 72 - 75 ]). Note also that optimization trials could also be conducted that are explicitly used to support algorithm development (eg, system identification experiments [ 76 - 78 ] or more data-driven algorithm development from RWD [ 79 , 80 ]). Like phase I, proof-of-concept and optimization trials can be used iteratively.…”
Section: The Dtx Rwe Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, optimization trials can be used to support the evidence-based selection of DTx components (factorial trials) [ 64 - 68 ], refinement of components, particularly those used across time (microrandomized trials) [ 35 , 69 , 70 ], and refinement of adaptation algorithms to match the provision of support to context, individual differences, and timing (microrandomized trials [ 35 , 71 ], and sequential multiple assignment randomized trials [ 72 - 75 ]). Note also that optimization trials could also be conducted that are explicitly used to support algorithm development (eg, system identification experiments [ 76 - 78 ] or more data-driven algorithm development from RWD [ 79 , 80 ]). Like phase I, proof-of-concept and optimization trials can be used iteratively.…”
Section: The Dtx Rwe Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the optimization criteria are met, then this can often justify movement to phase III. Plausible optimization trials for this phase could include but are not limited to: A/B testing (as used in the technology industry for improving usability) [ 85 - 87 ], factorial trials as used in MOST [ 64 , 65 , 67 , 68 ], sequential multiple assigned randomized trials [ 72 - 75 ], microrandomized trials [ 35 , 36 , 69 - 71 ], system identification experiments [ 76 - 78 ], studies explicitly designed to support algorithm development [ 79 , 80 ], and control optimization trials [ 37 , 88 ]. Nahum-Shani et al [ 40 ] provide guidance on when to use common optimization trial designs.…”
Section: The Dtx Rwe Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computational models mathematically characterize processes (or systems) that repeatedly output specific outcomes in response to repeated inputs 131 . Mechanistic models belong to the family of computational models.…”
Section: Computational Mechanistic Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, no modeling approach is universally better than others, and the mechanistic-computational approach is no exception. Instead, it is often advised to, when appropriate, combine mechanistic modeling with machine learning and statistical modeling as such a hybrid approach allows one to take advantage of the benefits of each modeling methodology while balancing their pros and cons [131][132][133][134][135][136][137] .…”
Section: Computational Mechanistic Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%