2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jterra.2005.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic modeling of soil–tool interaction: An overview from a fluid flow perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
42
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
42
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The analytical methods discussed here, are based on passive earth pressure theory and assumptions of a preliminary soil failure pattern [1]. Dynamic effects, complicated tool geometry and large deformations can not be modelled using these methods.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The analytical methods discussed here, are based on passive earth pressure theory and assumptions of a preliminary soil failure pattern [1]. Dynamic effects, complicated tool geometry and large deformations can not be modelled using these methods.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simplest form of soil cutting or tillage is that of a flat blade moving through the soil. Karmakar [1] summarises the different approaches used to model soil cutting. Six major methods can be identified, namely empirical/semi-empirical, dimensional analysis, Finite Element Methods (fem), Discrete Element Methods (dem), Artificial Neural Networks (ann) and Computational Fluid Dynamics (cfd).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A better understanding of soil-tool interface can be obtained by correlating the rheological behavior of soil with its dynamic features, and the disruption of the soil will depend on the geometry of the tool, operating speed and soil physical properties (KARMAKAR & KUSHWAHA, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The equations developed to predict traction efforts of narrow tools are based on rectangular models (GODWIN & O´DOGHERTY, 2007). KARMAKAR & KUSHWAHA (2006) point out that a better understanding of soil-tool interaction is obtained by correlating soil rheological behavior with its dynamic features, and mathematical solutions based on empirical and semi-empirical models were developed to describe this interaction. MANUWA & ADEMOSUN (2007), CONTE et al (2008) and MANUWA (2009, note that the geometric aspects and the water content of the soil determine the tractive effort produced by narrow tillage tools, and that the ratio width/depth of the tool should be considered when going to the design of the equipment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%