The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.08.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic modeling of organic carbon fates in lake ecosystems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2.2) includes the "shape factor" coefficient C θ , which determines the vertical temperature profile below the mixed layer. Evolution of this parameter is controlled by a relaxation timescale t rc (Mironov, 2008). This timescale includes the dimensionless relaxation constant C rc with a default value of 0.003 in the model.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…2.2) includes the "shape factor" coefficient C θ , which determines the vertical temperature profile below the mixed layer. Evolution of this parameter is controlled by a relaxation timescale t rc (Mironov, 2008). This timescale includes the dimensionless relaxation constant C rc with a default value of 0.003 in the model.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the first class there are the recently developed models ALBM and MTCR-1, while k − ε models include LAKE and LAKEoneD. The FLake model stands aside from the other 1-D models due to the two-layer bulk structure which employs the concept of self-similarity to estimate the temperature profile in the mixed layer and thermocline, respectively (Mironov, 2008). In the mixed layer the temperature is assumed to be constant, whereas below it is parameterized as a function of non-dimensional depth.…”
Section: Lake Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Hence, the primary drawback of the models used in respect to DIC simulation is likely to be not explicitly simulating transport of carbon species from catchment to a water body. Thus, modelling approaches coupling the catchment and a lake presented recently (Futter et al, 2008;Duffy et al, 2018;McCullough et al, 2018) should be elaborated and wider used.…”
Section: Interactive Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%