2010
DOI: 10.1115/1.4002431
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Modeling of Hydrokinetic Energy Extraction

Abstract: The world is facing an imminent energy crisis. In order to sustain our energy supply, it is necessary to advance renewable technologies. Despite this urgency, however, it is paramount to consider the larger environmental effects associated with using renewable resources. Hydropower, in the past, has been seen as a viable resource to examine, given that its basics of mechanical to electrical energy conversion seem to have little effect on the environment. Discrete analysis of dams and in-stream diversion set-up… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, since LES and DNS methods require very fine grids for wall-bounded flows, they are still in development stages for high Reynolds number flow; therefore, they are not practical for modeling the flow around the hydrokinetic turbine. An alternative for CFD simulation is the use of unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (URANS) turbulence models, which are computationally economical and of great use among both industry and academia in comparison with LES models [41,42,[44][45][46][47][48][49][50].…”
Section: Vertical Axis Hydrokinetic Turbine Hydrodynamic Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, since LES and DNS methods require very fine grids for wall-bounded flows, they are still in development stages for high Reynolds number flow; therefore, they are not practical for modeling the flow around the hydrokinetic turbine. An alternative for CFD simulation is the use of unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (URANS) turbulence models, which are computationally economical and of great use among both industry and academia in comparison with LES models [41,42,[44][45][46][47][48][49][50].…”
Section: Vertical Axis Hydrokinetic Turbine Hydrodynamic Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%