2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.03.092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic modeling of a sensible thermal energy storage tank with an immersed coil heat exchanger under three operation modes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simulations carried out by Raccanello, Rech & Lazzaretto (2019) using a one-dimensional model with a similar buffer tank configuration showed that the temperatures of each layer of the tank were all calculated within a 5% error compared to the experimental data. Another study for thermal energy storage in a water storage tank carried out by Nash, Badithela & Jain (2017) showed a root square mean error of 0.1 compared to experimentally obtained data using a model with 10 nodes, similar to the model developed as part of this study. Additionally, a de-stratification conductivity (kdestr) coefficient of 0.285 m -work carried out by Angrisani et al (2014) who developed and calibrated a one-dimensional thermal storage model using experimental data.…”
Section: Limitations and Validity Of The Modelsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The simulations carried out by Raccanello, Rech & Lazzaretto (2019) using a one-dimensional model with a similar buffer tank configuration showed that the temperatures of each layer of the tank were all calculated within a 5% error compared to the experimental data. Another study for thermal energy storage in a water storage tank carried out by Nash, Badithela & Jain (2017) showed a root square mean error of 0.1 compared to experimentally obtained data using a model with 10 nodes, similar to the model developed as part of this study. Additionally, a de-stratification conductivity (kdestr) coefficient of 0.285 m -work carried out by Angrisani et al (2014) who developed and calibrated a one-dimensional thermal storage model using experimental data.…”
Section: Limitations and Validity Of The Modelsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The output equation of the state-space representation remains as in Equation (10). From Equations (10) and (12), it can be observed that the linearised model is valid only for a very small range of operation as the initial temperature differences ΔT li inside the tank may vary significantly. Furthermore, for fully charged or fully discharged conditions (i.e.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Linear Tes Model For Linear Observer Dementioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the state-space representation of the TES system in Equations (10) and (12), a transfer function between the average temperature of the tank layers T ave ¼ T 1 þ T 2 þ ⋯ þ T 5 ð Þ=5 and the mass flow rate _ m is given as:…”
Section: Control Of the Tes Tank Based On Its Socmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The three main subsystems of the t-TPES are: (i) heating coil, (ii) heat pump, and (iii) heat engine. The heating coil is modeled as a resistive load with 98.5% efficiency [18]. The heat pump is modeled using a variable frequency drive (VFD), and V/f control is used for simple speed control of the induction motor [19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Integrated Electrical-thermal Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%