2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.03.070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic modeling of a dual fluidized-bed system with the circulation of dry sorbent for CO2 capture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The amine-based capture process is widely studied as a postcombustion capture process, and various process configurations are feasible to enhance the capture efficiency. , The demands to reduce the capture cost and to improve eco-friendliness drive the development of alternatives. One of the strong candidates is the cyclic capture process using chemical dry sorbents. , Three different Ca-based sorbents (natural CaCO 3 , natural dolomite, and synthetic CaO) have been evaluated for carbon capture from NGCC; since the sorbents are operated at a high CO 2 recycle temperature, the capacity and stability of sorbents and heat recovery have been investigated . Chemical absorption/adsorption for postcombustion carbon capture was evaluated with respect to the technoeconomic performance of NGCCs .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The amine-based capture process is widely studied as a postcombustion capture process, and various process configurations are feasible to enhance the capture efficiency. , The demands to reduce the capture cost and to improve eco-friendliness drive the development of alternatives. One of the strong candidates is the cyclic capture process using chemical dry sorbents. , Three different Ca-based sorbents (natural CaCO 3 , natural dolomite, and synthetic CaO) have been evaluated for carbon capture from NGCC; since the sorbents are operated at a high CO 2 recycle temperature, the capacity and stability of sorbents and heat recovery have been investigated . Chemical absorption/adsorption for postcombustion carbon capture was evaluated with respect to the technoeconomic performance of NGCCs .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the strong candidates is the cyclic capture process using chemical dry sorbents. 10,11 Three different Ca-based sorbents (natural CaCO 3 , natural dolomite, and synthetic CaO) have been evaluated for carbon capture from NGCC; since the sorbents are operated at a high CO 2 recycle temperature, the capacity and stability of sorbents and heat recovery have been investigated. 12 Chemical absorption/adsorption for postcombustion carbon capture was evaluated with respect to the technoeconomic performance of NGCCs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the textural properties, the particle size of adsorbents is another important parameter because powder-type adsorbents cause a large pressure drop . Pellet- or bead-type activated carbons are more feasible for practical applications in gas separation. , Furthermore, because the abrasion resistance and durability of particles can reduce powder generation during particle collision, bead-type activated carbons are more reliable for CO 2 capture processes, in which a fluidized bed is utilized to handle the massive throughput of CO 2 effluent gases. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, there have been numerous published works that have examined the simulation of heterogeneous gas-solid reaction systems in drop-tube or downflow reactors using mathematical models with different levels of complexity and accuracy [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. Drop-tube reactors present a number of advantages compared to other types of reactors (i.e., risers), and are well known in the chemical and petrochemical industries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solids are spherical, with uniform sizes and temperatures. Change in the particle size during carbonation reaction is assumed negligible [16]. • Kinetic energy and work forces of the system are negligible in comparison with thermal energy due to the high temperature in the reactor [18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%