2014
DOI: 10.1177/1464419314541790
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic modeling and nonlinear boundary control of hybrid Euler–Bernoulli beam system with a tip mass

Abstract: This paper presents dynamic modeling and Lyapunov-based boundary control of a hybrid Euler-Bernoulli beam. The beam is hybrid in the sense that it holds both rigid and elastic motions. The beam is equipped with actuators hub at one end and it carries the payload as the tip mass at the free end. The distributed parameter dynamic equations (i.e. partial differential equations governing the hybrid beam motion) are derived using Hamilton's principle. The dynamic model consists of four distributed parameter dynamic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(64 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Simulation results are presented in this section to illustrate the advantage of the proposed method. To achieve numerical results, the Galerkin method was applied to discretize the dynamic PDE model given by Equations (12) and (13). Numerical values have been reported in Table 1.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Simulation results are presented in this section to illustrate the advantage of the proposed method. To achieve numerical results, the Galerkin method was applied to discretize the dynamic PDE model given by Equations (12) and (13). Numerical values have been reported in Table 1.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Therefore, to achieve economical and realistic control systems and to overcome the hardware complexities of distributed control approaches, boundary control by stabilizing the flexible system only through its boundary without intruding into the domain sounds promising. 8,9 This has recently motivated different studies on the PDE-based boundary control of the flexible structures such as string, 10 rod, 11 beam, [12][13][14] plate, 15,16 marine riser, 17 satellite, 18 rotor, 19 wind turbine tower, 20 systems subject to moving mass, 21 moving belt, 22,23 and gantry crane. 24 The power of PDE boundary control has been also examined to overcome the challenges facing researchers in control of flexible arms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, this paper considers the velocity and slope of the beam at the controlled boundary as the outputs of the control system and uses them as the measured signals. From a practical point of view, this is essentially an advantage because the existing boundary control schemes [1,2,[4][5][6][28][29][30][31], proposed for different beam-type structures, mostly entail the additional feedback from shear force. The main contributions of the article can be summarized in three parts as follows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Krstic et al solved different boundary control problems in connection with the beam vibration using the backstepping approach [25][26][27]. Tavasoli [28] proposed nonlinear boundary control of a hybrid Euler-Bernoulli beam with coupled rigid-flexible motion in the plane.The aforementioned works neglect the effect of external disturbances, which is a significant factor that degrades the system performance [5]. Therefore, Ge et al investigated vibration control of the Euler-Bernoulli beam under unknown spatiotemporally varying disturbance [29].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation