1984
DOI: 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(84)81350-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Model for Combined Simulation of Dairy Management Strategies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

1986
1986
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This was not the case with previous models that focused on reproduction and ignored feeding (e.g. Oltenacu et al, 1980;Cournut and Dedieu, 2004) or represented animal performance with a pull approach (Congleton, 1984). In addition, the dynamic representation of energy partitioning (depending on the goat's physiological state and body reserve level) makes it possible to express individual variability, which is not the case with models based on fixed rules of energy partitioning (e.g.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This was not the case with previous models that focused on reproduction and ignored feeding (e.g. Oltenacu et al, 1980;Cournut and Dedieu, 2004) or represented animal performance with a pull approach (Congleton, 1984). In addition, the dynamic representation of energy partitioning (depending on the goat's physiological state and body reserve level) makes it possible to express individual variability, which is not the case with models based on fixed rules of energy partitioning (e.g.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Individual-based models have overcome this limitation as they take into account each individual whose state changes over time independently from others according to management events (Congleton, 1984;Sorensen et al, 1992;Tess and Kolstad, 2000). Nutrient partitioning is, however, still based on a fixed hierarchy among functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various simulation models with different purposes have been developed for beef cattle (Long et al, 1975;Lamb et al, 1992;Hirooka et al, 1998), dairy cattle (Congleton, 1984;Groen, 1988;Bryant et al, 2008), swine (Tess et al, 1983;McLaren et al, 1987), and sheep Wang and Dickerson, 1991;Cannas et al, 2004). For goats, the first prodnction model was described by Blackbnrn et al (1987) as an extended version of a sheep model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Le modèle permet ainsi évaluer les effets de la conduite de la reproduction et des politiques de réforme, basées sur des critères reproductifs et laitiers, sur les résultats du troupeau. Ce type de représentation est également adopté dans les modèles de Marsh et al (1987), Congleton (1984) et Dijhkuizen et al (1986). Le modèle d' Ezanno (2005) s'écarte de la production potentielle pour se diriger vers une représentation de la production permise par les ressources.…”
Section: / L'animal Un Ensemble De Variables Liées à La Production Punclassified
“…Du point de vue du renouvellement, le niveau individuel permet de prendre en compte des critères de sélection des animaux à réformer ou à conserver pour le renouvellement. Pour simuler la réforme d'un animal, les modèles intègrent une combinaison de critères individuels : infertilité, niveau de production laitière, âge (Oltenacu et al 1980, Congleton 1984, Dijhkuizen et al 1986. Pour simuler la sélection d'une femelle pour le renouvellement, les modèles intègrent principalement un critère laitier (Dijhkuizen et al 1986) et plus rarement un critère d'âge (Congleton 1984).…”
Section: B) Des Interactions Entre Les Paramètres Définis à L'échelleunclassified