2019
DOI: 10.1063/1.5085474
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic mode tracking and control with a relaxation method

Abstract: Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) usually requires advanced and accurate diagnostics to help improve our understanding especially in the context of fully unsteady 3D simulations. To do so, two kinds of tools exist today: operator-based and data-based analyses. The most well known data-based analysis used in fluid mechanics is probably the dynamic mode decomposition. This method has indeed shown to be powerful to study CFD results without assumption. It is, however, memory consuming and very sensitive to noise… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The importance of AFC is apparent from the large body of literature that discusses both theoretical, computational, and experimental aspects of the problem. In particular, active flow control has been discussed in simulations using both Reduced Order Models and harmonic forcing (Bergmann et al, 2005), direct simulations coupled with the adjoint method (Flinois & Colonius, 2015) or linearized models (Lee et al, 2001), and mode tracking methods (Queguineur et al, 2019). Realistic actuation mechanisms, such as plasma actuators (Sato et al, 2015), suction mechanisms (Wang et al, 2016), transverse motion (Li & Aubry, 2003), periodic oscillations (Lu et al, 2011), oscillating foils (Bao & Tao, 2013), air jets (Zhu et al, 2019), or Lorentz forces in conductive media (Breuer et al, 2004), are also discussed in details, as well as limitations imposed by real-wold systems (Belson et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of AFC is apparent from the large body of literature that discusses both theoretical, computational, and experimental aspects of the problem. In particular, active flow control has been discussed in simulations using both Reduced Order Models and harmonic forcing (Bergmann et al, 2005), direct simulations coupled with the adjoint method (Flinois & Colonius, 2015) or linearized models (Lee et al, 2001), and mode tracking methods (Queguineur et al, 2019). Realistic actuation mechanisms, such as plasma actuators (Sato et al, 2015), suction mechanisms (Wang et al, 2016), transverse motion (Li & Aubry, 2003), periodic oscillations (Lu et al, 2011), oscillating foils (Bao & Tao, 2013), air jets (Zhu et al, 2019), or Lorentz forces in conductive media (Breuer et al, 2004), are also discussed in details, as well as limitations imposed by real-wold systems (Belson et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the HFPs can still be seen in the noise spectrum, and they appear at the same frequencies with or without the stator vanes. The tones observed in Figure 14 can be further investigated using a mode decomposition technique, which is known as Dynamic Mode Tracking (DMT) [41].…”
Section: Aeroacoustic Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of our knowledge, nekStab is the first general-purpose computational framework capable of stabilizing fully 3D unstable periodic orbits (forced or unforced) and fixed points, as well as computing direct, adjoint modes and transient growth analyses for both steady and periodic flows. The menu of options includes a matrix-free Newton GMRES solver as well as other classical techniques such as selective frequency damping (SFD) [1], BoostConv [70], Time-Delayed Feedback (TDF) [210,237], and Dynamic Mode Tracking (DMT) [211], as well as post-processing routines such as the kinetic energy budget of the leading modes based on the Reynolds-Orr decomposition [38,154], steady-state base flow, and sensitivity analyzes [174].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%