2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2006.03.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic microfiltration with a vibrating hollow fiber membrane module: Filtration of yeast suspensions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
87
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
5
87
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The unsteady-state shear induced by vibration can be related to performance enhancement to provide a quantitative assessment of the beneficiation [123]. Beier and coworkers [229][230][231] Figure 4 shows that both higher amplitudes and higher frequencies for longitudinal vibration contribute towards fouling mitigation, with an observed reduction in the fouling rate by as much as 90% [23]. Genkin et al [224] found that the critical flux has a stronger dependency on frequency at higher frequencies but a weaker dependency at lower frequencies, presumably due to a change of the flow regime in the vibrating system.…”
Section: Vibrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The unsteady-state shear induced by vibration can be related to performance enhancement to provide a quantitative assessment of the beneficiation [123]. Beier and coworkers [229][230][231] Figure 4 shows that both higher amplitudes and higher frequencies for longitudinal vibration contribute towards fouling mitigation, with an observed reduction in the fouling rate by as much as 90% [23]. Genkin et al [224] found that the critical flux has a stronger dependency on frequency at higher frequencies but a weaker dependency at lower frequencies, presumably due to a change of the flow regime in the vibrating system.…”
Section: Vibrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, improving the hydrodynamics can also be performed by applying dynamic membrane systems (Altaee et al, 2009;Beier et al, 2006;Bilad et al, 2012a;Genkin et al, 2006;Jaffrin, 2008 All types of pressure driven membranes have been used in lab-scale MBRs, but only MF and UF membranes are used so far in full-scales (Judd, 2008). The application of NF and RO in MBRs was driven by the motivation to realize a single process for direct water re-use purposes.…”
Section: Hydrodynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These systems also have other drawbacks, such as apparatus complexity, high tendency of the apparatus to breakdown at the moving parts, and most systems have a very low packing density that leads to very high costs per membrane area. (Beier et al, 2006) Currently, only relatively low numbers of existing DFS are available in the full-scale applications. However, the new generation of commercial DFSs, such as vibratory shearenhanced processing systems (VSEP) that minimize energy consumption by using the resonance frequency, are expected to present a low specific energy per volume of permeate in a large industrial module, as the power consumption of the vibrating elements is almost independent of the membrane area.…”
Section: Mf (Westfalia Separator)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations