2003
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0887-3828(2003)17:3(126)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Measurements of In-Place Steel Floors to Assess Vibration Performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, if the excitation level is too great, rattling and other non-linear behaviour may be induced and hence the quality of the data will be reduced. Hanagan et al (2003) and Raebel et al (2001) both report that the location of excitation has little bearing on data quality so long as nodal lines and supports are avoided.…”
Section: Modal Property-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, if the excitation level is too great, rattling and other non-linear behaviour may be induced and hence the quality of the data will be reduced. Hanagan et al (2003) and Raebel et al (2001) both report that the location of excitation has little bearing on data quality so long as nodal lines and supports are avoided.…”
Section: Modal Property-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensors placed at boundaries yielded erroneous results. Hanagan et al (2003) found the mounting of the sensors is critical in gaining useful data.…”
Section: Modal Property-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Previous studies have shown that when these floors are lightweight and are used in projects with free architectural plans, they can be susceptible to excessive vertical vibration problems that are basically induced by humans walking on the floors (Hanagan, Raebel, & Trethewey, 2003). When the level of the generated vibrations exceeds the perception threshold of humans, it is highly likely that claims and adverse comments will be made by the users.…”
Section: Problem Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%