2019
DOI: 10.1155/2019/8398356
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Matching in Cloud Manufacturing considering Matching Costs

Abstract: As a service-oriented business platform model, the nature of cloud manufacturing is to realise the manufacturing resources’ sharing, which will largely benefit resources supplier, resources demander, and platform operator. However, it also faces some new problems. One of the most critical issues is how to dynamically match resources of supply and demand to maximise profits of all parties while considering matching costs. This paper investigates the resources’ dynamic matching in a manufacturing supply chain th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In all, 24 papers answer none of the two questions, but they are more or less related to SMEs’ adoption of HPC or cloud contract as they addressed the benefits or the challenges of SMEs accessing HPC through the cloud or the challenges associated with cloud contract (Gašperlin et al , 2019; Borštnar et al , 2015; Besednjak Valič et al , 2021; Botelho and O’Gorman, 2021; Overly, 2017). Some of them discussed cloud contracts from a legal perspective such as copyright (Savelyev, 2014), cost sharing or cost deferral (Chen et al , 2019; Goldstein, 2020) or treating cloud contract as a digital asset (Banta, 2014). Some of the papers investigated cloud computing resource provision, such as designing an auto-scaling mechanism to reduce violation and proposing a multiple stage programme to optimize resource allocation (Yadav et al , 2022; Bülbül et al , 2021), while others focused on the technological aspects such as how to design a smart contract using blockchain (Aguilera et al , 2021; Dorsala et al , 2020; Xu et al , 2020) or algorithm issues in the cloud contract (Tiganoaia et al , 2019; Taylor et al , 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all, 24 papers answer none of the two questions, but they are more or less related to SMEs’ adoption of HPC or cloud contract as they addressed the benefits or the challenges of SMEs accessing HPC through the cloud or the challenges associated with cloud contract (Gašperlin et al , 2019; Borštnar et al , 2015; Besednjak Valič et al , 2021; Botelho and O’Gorman, 2021; Overly, 2017). Some of them discussed cloud contracts from a legal perspective such as copyright (Savelyev, 2014), cost sharing or cost deferral (Chen et al , 2019; Goldstein, 2020) or treating cloud contract as a digital asset (Banta, 2014). Some of the papers investigated cloud computing resource provision, such as designing an auto-scaling mechanism to reduce violation and proposing a multiple stage programme to optimize resource allocation (Yadav et al , 2022; Bülbül et al , 2021), while others focused on the technological aspects such as how to design a smart contract using blockchain (Aguilera et al , 2021; Dorsala et al , 2020; Xu et al , 2020) or algorithm issues in the cloud contract (Tiganoaia et al , 2019; Taylor et al , 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above literature mainly focuses on the pricing and optimal resource allocation for a manufacturing platform. Only a few academics have paid attention to the service investment strategy of these platforms [3,4]. Chen et al [3] considered the influence of the matching service investment of manufacturing platforms on market demand.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As information technology has developed rapidly in recent years, third-party ecommerce platforms in the manufacturing industry [1,2], such as MFG.com in the US [3], SAP Ariba in Germany [4], CASICloud [5], and DHgate.com [6] in China, have become an effective approach for enterprises' cooperation [7]. These platforms reduce the time and geographical restrictions of traditional production cooperation, thus significantly reducing enterprises' transaction costs and improving market transaction efficiency [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lin et al [14,15] proposed an integrated random forest algorithm, which extended the multiresource scheduling and power consumption model of CloudSim. Wang et al [16,17] decomposed the multiobjective scheduling problem into a certain number of scalar quantum problems, dynamically matched supply and demand resources while considering the matching cost, and solved all subproblems in a single operation. Jiang et al [18] developed a crowd perception incentive model based on the voting mechanism, enabling each participant to perform multiple tasks, which greatly improved the participants' execution ability.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%