2009
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1601926
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Macroeconomic Effects of Public Capital: Evidence from Regional Italian Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 140 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kamps (2005), for a group of OECD countries including Italy, find a positive long‐run elasticity of public capital with respect to private capital, a negative effect on employment, and a positive albeit not significant effect on GDP. In an analysis of Italian regions, Di Giacinto et al. (2010) document a positive contribution of the public capital to output in all geographical areas of the Country.…”
Section: Related Literature and Motivations For The Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Kamps (2005), for a group of OECD countries including Italy, find a positive long‐run elasticity of public capital with respect to private capital, a negative effect on employment, and a positive albeit not significant effect on GDP. In an analysis of Italian regions, Di Giacinto et al. (2010) document a positive contribution of the public capital to output in all geographical areas of the Country.…”
Section: Related Literature and Motivations For The Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the different capital stock definitions proposed in the literature, we choose to rely on the notion of productive capital, which allows us to introduce a decreasing rate of efficiency of surviving assets over time. The productive capital (expressed in terms of standard efficiency units) is a measure of capital services that different types of assets provide to the production process at a given moment in time, and is computed as: Where: ; I t ‐ i = gross investment flows between t − 1 and t ; S t = survival rate at t of past investment made between t − i − 1 and t − i ; and e i = efficiency of an i ‐period old asset, with a hyperbolic function (see Di Giacinto et al. 2010, for further details on the methodology utilized to compile the public capital stock figures).…”
Section: The Public Infrastructure Data Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations