2007
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/75/1/012026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic lift measurements on a FX79W151A airfoil via pressure distribution on the wind tunnel walls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main difference between an AFP and terrestrial force plate is that AFPs are much more sensitive to pressure per unit surface area. This sensitivity also makes the AFP applicable to wind tunnels in which they could integrate the wall pressure distribution to determine the vertical aerodynamic force [ 33 ]. Theoretically, this real-time method should work for many animals, robots and objects that generate a net force in a fluid.…”
Section: In Vivo Demonstration and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main difference between an AFP and terrestrial force plate is that AFPs are much more sensitive to pressure per unit surface area. This sensitivity also makes the AFP applicable to wind tunnels in which they could integrate the wall pressure distribution to determine the vertical aerodynamic force [ 33 ]. Theoretically, this real-time method should work for many animals, robots and objects that generate a net force in a fluid.…”
Section: In Vivo Demonstration and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurements were performed in the closed test section (nozzle area of 1.0 m × 0.8 m, length of 2.0 m) of the closed loop wind tunnel of the University of Oldenburg (for further details of the setup see [4]). Wind speeds up to 50 m/s were reached.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the NACA test, the lift is deduced from the pressure distributions measured on the aerofoil surfaces, and the drag is evaluated from the pressure in the wake (27) . Such methods allow the measuring devices to be placed near the centre of the wing span (28) , and hence the 3D effect can be significantly reduced, whereas in the present wind-tunnel test, all the forces are measured directly with the force balance and the forces on the wing tips are included. The mechanical clearance between the wing tips and splitters causes 3D effects that increase drag and reduce lift that leads to the difference in the results.…”
Section: Aerodynamic Performancementioning
confidence: 99%