2002
DOI: 10.1053/jcan.2002.128437
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic left ventricular outflow tract obstruction caused by afterload reduction induced by intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interventions to increase afterload (the Mueller maneuver, phenylephrine infusion), reduce dynamic LVOT obstruction, whereas maneuvers that decrease afterload (vasodilators or intraaortic balloon counterpulsation) result in augmented LVOT obstruction. [4][5][6][7] AVR leads to an immediate reduction in fixed afterload, which contributes to an increased LVOT flow velocity. 8 The resulting convective acceleration of blood in the LVOT may produce a Venturi effect, drawing the mitral valve anteriorly and creating LVOT obstruction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interventions to increase afterload (the Mueller maneuver, phenylephrine infusion), reduce dynamic LVOT obstruction, whereas maneuvers that decrease afterload (vasodilators or intraaortic balloon counterpulsation) result in augmented LVOT obstruction. [4][5][6][7] AVR leads to an immediate reduction in fixed afterload, which contributes to an increased LVOT flow velocity. 8 The resulting convective acceleration of blood in the LVOT may produce a Venturi effect, drawing the mitral valve anteriorly and creating LVOT obstruction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It improves systemic blood and diastolic coronary flow, and therefore myocardial oxygen delivery, while reducing afterload and myocardial oxygen demand. On the other hand, it has been recognized that IABP has potential to contribute to hemodynamic deterioration by inducing or worsening LVOTO [5,6]. It is notable that discontinuation of IABP as a single intervention led to complete regression of LVOTO, dramatic increase of her CI, and recovery from cardiogenic shock in the present case in spite of minimal reduction of LVOTO by discontinuation of dopamine and dobutamine, which indicated that IABP primarily induced or worsened dynamic LVOTO by reducing afterload.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…α 1 -Agonists increase the size of the functional out-flow tract and decrease the LVOT pressure gradient by increasing systemic vascular resistance and end-systolic and end-diastolic left ventricular volume. [10] Inotropes (β-agonists/milrinone) or IABP may worsen the condition by decreasing afterload;[11] hence, they were discontinued in our patient once the diagnosis was suspected. When beta-blockers cannot be used due to shock, dual chamber pacing with low heart rate can be used in reducing heart rate and contractility with subsequent reduction in LVOT gradient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%