Dynamic LED light versus static LED light for depressed inpatients: results from a randomized feasibility trial

Abstract

Background: Retrospective studies conducted in psychiatric wards have indicated a shorter duration of stay for depressed inpatients in bright compared to dim daylight-exposed rooms, pointing to a possible antidepressant effect of daylight conditions. Dynamic LED lighting, aiming to mimic daylight conditions, are currently been installed in several hospitals, but their feasibility is poorly investigated. Methods: To investigate the feasibility of these systems, we developed and installed a LED-lighting system in four rooms in a psychiatric inpatient ward. The system could function statically or dynamically regarding light intensity and colour temperature. The system consisted of (A) a large LED luminaire built into the window jamb mimicking sunlight reflections, (B) two LED light luminaires in the ceiling and (C) a LED reading luminaire. In the static mode, the systems provided constant light from A and B. In the dynamic mode, the system changed light intensity and colour temperature using A, B and C. Patients with unipolar or bipolar depression were randomised to dynamic or static LED lighting for 4 weeks, in addition to standard treatment. Primary outcome was the rate of patients discontinuing the trial due to discomfort from the lighting condition. Secondary outcomes were recruitment and dropout rates, visual comfort, depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation. Results: No participants discontinued due to discomfort from the LED lighting. Recruitment rate was 39.8%, dropout from treatment rates were 56.3% in the dynamic group and 33.3% in the static group. 78.1% in the dynamic group were satisfied with the lighting compared with 71.8% in the static group. Discomfort from the light (glare) was reported by 11.5% in the dynamic group compared to 5.1% in the static group. Endpoint suicidal scores were 16.8 (10.4) in the dynamic and 16.3 (14.9) in the static group. The lighting system was 100% functional. The light sensor system proved unstable. Conclusion: Dropout from treatment was high primarily due to early discharge and with a lack of endpoint assessments. The feasibility study has influenced an upcoming large-scale dynamic lighting efficacy trial where we will use a shorter study period of 3 weeks and with more emphasis on endpoint assessments. The lighting was well tolerated in both groups, but some found intensity too low in the evening. Thus, we will use higher intensity blue-enriched light in the morning and higher intensity amber (blue-depleted) light in the evening in the upcoming study. The light sensor system needs to be improved

How does psilocybin therapy work? An exploration of experiential avoidance as a putative mechanism of change

“…Suicidal ideation levels in the present study were lower than those reported among individuals with likely MDD (based on the PHQ-9) in the SIDAS validation manuscript (Van Spijker et al, 2014), as well as those previously described in inpatient (Volf et al, 2020) and outpatient (Halford et al, 2021) clinical trials for the treatment of MDD. These relatively low levels of suicidal ideation may be attributable to several of the present study's exclusion criteria, including exclusion of individuals with a history of serious suicide attempts requiring hospitalisation and several clinical presentations characterized by elevated suicidal ideation (e.g., borderline personality disorder, psychotic disorder, drug or alcohol dependence, and a history of mania).…”

The impact of the refresh frequency of lighting on visual and non-visual response

“…The heart rate, i.e., respiratory rate parameter, was taken as the mean value for one minute during environmental stimulation. Independent t-test was used to analyze the degree of difference in physiological fluctuations brought about by the dynamic and static lighting environment [5] .…”

Reproducing Solar Spectral Irradiance by LEDs

“…6a); (ii) high irradiance that might be used for testing aging processes of materials [41,42] (Fig. 6b); (iii) full bright sunlight on a sunny and cloud free situations [43,44,45] (Fig. 6c); (iv) the spectral irradiance environment of understory plants within a tree (birch) canopy [46,47,48] (Fig.…”