2009
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1525344
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Intraday Relations between Order Imbalance, Volatility and Return of Jump Losers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Harford and Kaul (2005) document a strong concurrent relation on the US stock market for 1986 and 1996. In the 2000s, this is confirmed for special samples such as top losers or gainers by Su and Huang (2008), Su et al (2009b), Su et al (2011), andHuang et al (2012). Apart from stocks, Locke and Onayev (2007, S&P 500) and Huang and Chou (2007, Taiwan) find strong intra-day relations for index futures.…”
Section: Empirical Results On Order Imbalance Effects In Asset Returnsmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Harford and Kaul (2005) document a strong concurrent relation on the US stock market for 1986 and 1996. In the 2000s, this is confirmed for special samples such as top losers or gainers by Su and Huang (2008), Su et al (2009b), Su et al (2011), andHuang et al (2012). Apart from stocks, Locke and Onayev (2007, S&P 500) and Huang and Chou (2007, Taiwan) find strong intra-day relations for index futures.…”
Section: Empirical Results On Order Imbalance Effects In Asset Returnsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…For example, stocks with extremely negative returns show faster return reversals than other stocks do. Accordingly, Su et al (2011) and Huang et al (2012) find strong negative links at lag 1 for NASDAQ and NYSE stocks, respectively. Conversely, stocks with extremely positive returns do not show any significant imbalance-return relation.…”
Section: Empirical Results On Order Imbalance Effects In Asset Returnsmentioning
confidence: 92%