2009
DOI: 10.1021/la901103r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Interfacial Tension Measurements with Microfluidic Y-Junctions

Abstract: Emulsification in microdevices (microfluidic emulsification) involves micrometer-sized droplets and fast interface expansion rates. In addition, droplets are formed in less than milliseconds, and therefore traditional tensiometric techniques cannot be used to quantify the actual interfacial tension. In this paper, monodisperse droplets formed at flat microfluidic Y-junctions were used to quantify the apparent dynamic interfacial tension during (microfluidic) emulsification. Hexadecane droplets were formed in e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
87
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, when surfactants are present the neck becomes more elongated and "flattened" as it approaches the inner corner of the T junction. Similar observations of neck "stretching" have been noted by other researchers when the interfacial tension is very low in T-junction generators [20,21]. The fatter neck may be caused by interfacial tension gradients on the back half of the droplet because of dilation differences across the interface as the neck collapses.…”
Section: Modification To the Droplet Formation Modelsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, when surfactants are present the neck becomes more elongated and "flattened" as it approaches the inner corner of the T junction. Similar observations of neck "stretching" have been noted by other researchers when the interfacial tension is very low in T-junction generators [20,21]. The fatter neck may be caused by interfacial tension gradients on the back half of the droplet because of dilation differences across the interface as the neck collapses.…”
Section: Modification To the Droplet Formation Modelsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…In addition, for each surfactant, the deviation from the model decreases with increasing surfactant concentration. More importantly, these data show that dynamic interfacial effects must always be considered when modeling microfluidic droplet generators, even for a small, fast adsorbing surfactant such as SDS [20,22].…”
Section: Experimental Observationsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…28 Recently, microfluidic devices with distinctive advantages, including small sample volume, high sensitivity, and point of care feasibility, have been introduced to effectively manipulate small amounts of fluids in microfluidic channels for biomedical applications. For example, several microfluidic platforms have been applied to measure fluid properties such as surface tension, 29,30 density, [31][32][33] pressure drop, [34][35][36] flow rate, 37,38 and fluid resistance. 39,40 Microfluidic platforms have also been adopted to measure fluid viscosity instead of conventional bulky platforms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%