2012
DOI: 10.1177/1754337112442299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic impact response characteristics of a helmeted Hybrid III headform using a centric and non-centric impact protocol

Abstract: A linear impactor system was used to apply a condensed version of the University of Ottawa Test Protocol, employing five centric and non-centric impact conditions, to a Hybrid III headform fitted with six certified ice hockey helmets. None of the helmeted conditions exceeded linear acceleration thresholds for traumatic or mild traumatic brain injury; however, five of the six helmets had angular acceleration results that were above the 80% risk of mild traumatic brain injury threshold proposed by Zhang et al. H… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When comparing the helmets on linear acceleration alone, 36 only helmet C performed better than the other models, while the rest were equivalent, and all passed the current standard. 4 This pattern is seen throughout the dynamic-dependent variables, with helmet C producing significantly lower values than the majority of the other helmet models.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When comparing the helmets on linear acceleration alone, 36 only helmet C performed better than the other models, while the rest were equivalent, and all passed the current standard. 4 This pattern is seen throughout the dynamic-dependent variables, with helmet C producing significantly lower values than the majority of the other helmet models.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Helmet C consistently out-performed the others across impact conditions for dynamic response, and helmets C and A performed the best using brain tissue values. Helmets B and F tended to result in the highest values for dynamic response, 36 with helmets B and D having the highest values for brain tissue deformation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…50,64,65 This model has been used in several recent papers for head impacts, head injury, helmet design, and concussion prediction. 29,45,6467…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25,27,28 In addition, the majority of all head-to-head impacts are not through the center of gravity of the head, resulting in a larger rotational component to the impact. 3,29,30 Therefore, the most common impact event in football, the head-to-head collision, results in a high risk of concussive injury, yet the current helmet is not designed specifically to protect against it. 31,32 The discrepancy between the impact event mechanism of concussive injury and the design and testing of current helmets may explain why the rate of concussion remains high.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%