2017
DOI: 10.1080/16081625.2017.1354709
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic impact of interest rate volatility and spillover effect of the U.S. interest rate on banking sector development of Turkey: empirical evidence from cointegration and causality analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results confirm that the financial integration between the U.S. and Turkish markets. These results also correspond with the findings of [ 38 ] and [ 9 ] that confirmed the U.S interest rates affect the Turkish markets. Also, the results showed that the ECT is negative and statistically significant at a 5% level.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results confirm that the financial integration between the U.S. and Turkish markets. These results also correspond with the findings of [ 38 ] and [ 9 ] that confirmed the U.S interest rates affect the Turkish markets. Also, the results showed that the ECT is negative and statistically significant at a 5% level.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…[ 37 ] indicated that Turkey’s financial market is significantly correlated with the U.S. financial markets. [ 38 ] suggested that U.S. interest rates have a powerful impact on the Turkish banking sector. However, most empirical studies focused on the effect of the U.S. interest rates on the stock market.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…to an increase (decrease) in energy consumption and then subsequently affect CO2 emissions. According to many empirical studies, RIN can affect economic performance by macroeconomic channels(Sokolov et al, 2011;Missio et al, 2015;Almahadin and Tuna, 2017; …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The positive significant coefficient of debt in default (0.0006) implies that a country with low default could improve banking efficiency, which requires policymakers and regulators to adopt new strategies that facilitate and restrict laws to protect the banking sector (Almahadin & Tuna, 2019; Chortareas et al, 2012; Claessens & Laeven, 2004; Fries & Taci, 2005; Goddard et al, 2011; Grigorian & Manole, 2002; Sufian & Majid, 2012). The positive significant coefficient of economic performance (0.0014) suggests that higher economic performance in union countries could result in better levels of banking efficiency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%