2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.12.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Imaging of Genomic Loci in Living Human Cells by an Optimized CRISPR/Cas System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
551
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 390 publications
(565 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
12
551
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Constrained motion could reflect hindrance imposed by physical attachment, a modification in the compaction parameters of the fiber or a combination of both. FROS-labeled loci in mammalian cells were also reported to be less dynamic [65] when next to the nuclear envelope, whereas Cas9-GFP or TALE-GFP marked telomeres tended to be rather mobile within the nuclear lumen in human cells [15]. Motion of randomly labeled sites [65] or of fluorescent ANCHOR tags next to specific genes (my group's unpublished data) is heterogeneous within a cell population, in which their localization with respect to nuclear compartments is likely to vary.…”
Section: Flexibility and Confinement Defined By Fiber Motionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Constrained motion could reflect hindrance imposed by physical attachment, a modification in the compaction parameters of the fiber or a combination of both. FROS-labeled loci in mammalian cells were also reported to be less dynamic [65] when next to the nuclear envelope, whereas Cas9-GFP or TALE-GFP marked telomeres tended to be rather mobile within the nuclear lumen in human cells [15]. Motion of randomly labeled sites [65] or of fluorescent ANCHOR tags next to specific genes (my group's unpublished data) is heterogeneous within a cell population, in which their localization with respect to nuclear compartments is likely to vary.…”
Section: Flexibility and Confinement Defined By Fiber Motionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Consequently, use of these systems has so far been restricted largely to labeling of naturally repeated sequences e.g. telomeres [35]. Suntag is a non-invasive technique but appears thus far to be reserved for selected proteins that retain their function within the construct [19].…”
Section: Visualizing Dna In Living Eukaryotic Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two innovative guide RNA designs have been reported to dramatically enhance the frequency of targeted mutagenesis. One modified sgRNA (F 1 E) with an extended Cas9 binding hairpin structure and the removal of a potential Polymerase III terminator exhibits improved activity in both mammalian cells and C. elegans (Chen et al, 2013a;Ward, 2015). The other design of sgRNAs, with a GG motif at the 3 0 end of protospacers, also significantly enhances the frequency of genome editing by Cas9 in C. elegans (Farboud and Meyer, 2015).…”
Section: Increasing Crispr-cas9 Editing Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent exciting development in labeling specific gene loci is the use of TALEs, (DNA binding proteins without endonuclease activity) or the CRISPR/dCas9 (deactivated Cas9 without the endonuclease activity) fused with fluorescent proteins. While the TALEs have been shown to be efficient in labeling repetitive sequences [69], CRISPR/dCas9 has also been used for labeling non-repetitive sequences [70]. Both of these labeling approaches are compatible with super-resolution microscopy (STED and SMLM) depending on the fluorescent protein used.…”
Section: Labeling Of Dnamentioning
confidence: 99%