2013
DOI: 10.3788/aos201333.0811003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Imaging Detection and Target Recognition for Cat-Eye Effect Echo

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, traditional cat-eye target detection systems are developed based on bistatic optical designs [4], [9], [10], where the transmitting and receiving optical axes are separated. These systems perform well when detecting larger, traditional cat-eye targets, but do not perform well when detecting mini-cameras.…”
Section: Optical System Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, traditional cat-eye target detection systems are developed based on bistatic optical designs [4], [9], [10], where the transmitting and receiving optical axes are separated. These systems perform well when detecting larger, traditional cat-eye targets, but do not perform well when detecting mini-cameras.…”
Section: Optical System Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional active laser detection systems utilize the chatoyancy effect, in which the laser beam is reflected directly back to the laser source by hidden camera lenses and the power of this retroreflection is significantly higher than that of the diffuse background signal [1]- [4]. However, when detecting mini-cameras, there are several limitations: (1) The size of the lens aperture of a minicamera is so small that the reflection is too weak to stand in stark contrast with the background;…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%