2007 10th International Conference on Information Fusion 2007
DOI: 10.1109/icif.2007.4408120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Image Fusion Performance Evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For more accurate comparison, besides the visual analysis, the performance of fusion algorithms needs to be further measured by objective quantitative analysis tools. Here two metric tools were used: the spatial-temporal gradient preservation based video fusion performance metric (DQ AB/F ) [21] and the mutual information of IFD images (IFD MI) [9]. DQ AB/F indicates how much the spatialtemporal information is extracted and transferred into the fused image sequence.…”
Section: Fusion Results Of Clear Image Sequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For more accurate comparison, besides the visual analysis, the performance of fusion algorithms needs to be further measured by objective quantitative analysis tools. Here two metric tools were used: the spatial-temporal gradient preservation based video fusion performance metric (DQ AB/F ) [21] and the mutual information of IFD images (IFD MI) [9]. DQ AB/F indicates how much the spatialtemporal information is extracted and transferred into the fused image sequence.…”
Section: Fusion Results Of Clear Image Sequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparing this approach to the simple select-max applied to central frame only, using the objective DQ video fusion performance measure [24] on a representative sequence illustrated in Figure 3, Figure 6 below, we see that the proposed approach improves fusion performance. However, although the increase in DQ is significant, there are still large oscillations through the frames.…”
Section: Dynamic Laplacian Rolling-pyramid Fusionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Further to these classic algorithms, new multi-scale techniques have more recently been proposed based on the static fusion using Curvelets [50], Ridgelets [51], Contourlets [14], Shearlet [3] as well as the Dual tree complex wavelet transform (DTCWT) [48]. The static fusion methods for video fusion are generally less computationally demanding, but since they ignore the temporally varying component of the available scene information, they can result in temporally unstable fused sequences exhibiting blinking effect distortions that affect the perceived fused video quality [15,24].…”
Section: Video Fusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because subjective evaluation requires lots of time, effort, and physical & human resources, we confine our comparison to objective evaluation using established objective measures. The measure are Mutual Information (MI) [14], Xydas & Petrovic (Q AB/F ) [15], and Piella & Heijmans (Q w ) [16] metrics. These measures, although not perfect, provide a good insight into the quality of fused images.…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%